Slik takler du Cubiks Logiks (Talogy) og PAPI testene

Riktig svar er: Perspire.

One blushes when they are embarrassed like one perspires (sweats) when they are afraid.

Riktig svar er: Blurred.

Blurred is a word used to describe something unclear. The other words are used to describe something clear and understandable. 

Cubiks Logisk General Intermediate og Advanced vil inneholde liknende spørsmål. Ved hjelp av vår PrepPack™ vil du kunne på spørsmål i denne stilen, slik at du føler deg bedre forberedt på det som kommer.

Riktig svar er: None of the above

Some tables are made from plastic - if all tables are made from wood, none of the tables are made from plastic. 

All furniture is made from wood - if some of the furniture is made from plastic, not all of the furniture is made from wood. 

All furniture is made from plastic - some furniture is made from plastic and "some" does not mean "all".

Du vil møte på slike spørsmål på den ekte testen. Noen av spørsmålene kan virke forvirrende, som øker risikoen for at du svarer feil. Dermed anbefaler vi å øve på testene ved hjelp av vår PrepPack™. 

Riktig svar er: 14

68 – (3 * 4) = 4 * ?

68 – 12 = 4 * ?

56 = 4 * ? // del begge sidene med 4

14 = ?

De fleste spørsmålene vil se slik ut: likninger som skal løses raskest mulig. Det er ingen garanti for at du får bruke kalkulator på testen, så det anbefales at du øver deg godt på forhånd slik at du kan regne ut oppgavene raskt på papir eller i hodet.

Riktig svar: 782

Slik løses oppgaven:

Her finner vi en tallrekke inni en tallrekke. Forskjellen mellom de tallverdiene vi ser i spørsmålet består av en egen tallrekke. Altså, forskjellen doblest først og deretter subtraheres den med et visst tall. Det subtraherte tallet økes med 2 hver gang. Du kan bruke denne logikken for å gå tilbake til den originale tallrekken og finne tallet som mangler.

(194 * 2) - 8 = 380

402 + 380 = 782

Riktig svar: 1

Det er fire regler som bestemmer mønsteret i serien:

• Antallet trekanter endres annen hver rute mellom 2 og 1.
• Trekantene roteres 90 grader i hver rute.
• Trekantene flytter seg mot klokka i ruta.
• I oddetallsruter (1, 3 og 5) ser vi kun én firkant. I partallsruter (2 og 4) økes antallet firkanter med én.

Ifølge den andre og tredje regelen kan du se at den manglende ruta burde inneholde to trekanter som peker nedover. Da gjenstår kun svaralternativene (1) og (3).

Siden den manglende ruta bør være et partall, må antallet firkanter øke med én siden forrige partallsrute (4). Det burde altså være fire firkanter i ruta som mangler.

Riktig svar er: Karst processes can be the catalyst of sinkholes

Option (A) is the correct answer because it focuses on the main aspect elaborated throughout the passage—karst processes creating sinkholes.

Option (B) is incorrect because it offers a definition for the term 'sinkhole', rather than describing the development of a sinkhole.

Option (C) is incorrect because it focuses on a specific stage. Though it may be the most important stage of the creation of a sinkhole, it cannot be considered the best summary of the passage.

Option (D) is incorrect because it also focuses on a specific stage. Unlike option (C), this is a secondary stage.

In order to calculate this we add up the total pageviews of Cuisine.net for April and May, and divide this amount by the total pageviews of both sites for the same period,
Therefore, the calculation is:

(35+45)/(35+45+70+60) = 80/210 = 38.1%

Riktig svar: 1

Figurene beveger seg på følgende vis:

Trekanten og sirkelen forflytter seg én seksjon om gangen mot klokka for hvert steg.
Stjerna og hjertet forflytter seg én seksjon om gangen med klokka for hvert steg.
Samtidig roteres trekanten og hjertet 180 grader for hvert steg.
Merk at hvis vi følger stjernas mønster kan vi eliminere alle svaralternativene utenom (1) og (2), og hvis vi følger hvilket som helst annet symbol kan vi også eliminere alle svaralternativene utenom (1).

Ved hjelp av stjerna og et annet symbol kan vi finne riktig svar.

Response one is ranked three, as this is not a bad response, but not a good one either.

This response does not necessarily indicate an in-depth consideration of options, but it demonstrates an inclination to make choices based on what is in the best interest of the company. Although you don't demonstrate superior decision-making skills, this response indicates other positive aspects of your personality. This is not a classic positive response, but it is definitely not a bad one either.

Responses two and five are both negative responses, as you put your personal development above company deadlines and obligations.

You agree immediately to your partner’s suggestion, without considering the results. By doing so, you fail to contemplate your options and prioritise your tasks. You take your colleague’s help as a given and put your own personal development above company deadlines and obligations. This is a negative response choice. 

Responses three and four are both good responses. Response four is better than response three, as you first ensure you can meet your deadlines, rather than agree to attend and attempt to meet your deadlines after.

In this response, you demonstrate ambition and determination as you are willing to work extra hard to complete your obligations and prepare adequately for the conference. However, you agree to attend the conference without re-evaluating your obligations and ensuring you will be able meet all your deadlines in time.

Responses three and four are both good responses. Response four is better than response three, as you first ensure you can meet your deadlines, rather than agree to attend and attempt to meet your deadlines after.

In this response, you show an ability to re-evaluate your obligations and prioritise your tasks. Only then do you make an educated decision based on the information you have collected. This is a positive response choice that displays excellent decision-making skills and conscientiousness. You not only prioritize, but you do so well, by taking responsibility for your previous commitments.

Responses two and five are both negative responses, as you put your personal development above company deadlines and obligations. Response five is worse due to the inconsideration of work colleagues and incomprehension of position and organizational hierarchy.

You agree to go, and you delegate your responsibilities to your colleagues. By doing so, you not only display a lack of consideration and prioritisation of your tasks, but also towards your work colleagues, who are now expected to complete your workload. You don’t ask your colleagues for help; rather you delegate your tasks and expect them to complete them according to your deadlines without consideration of their responsibilities. This shows incomprehension of your position and organizational hierarchy as you are not in a higher position than your colleagues and should not be taking upon yourself to delegate your tasks to them. You prefer your own personal development over company deadlines and over team effort. This is a very negative response choice.